{"id":32,"date":"2010-06-29T02:26:07","date_gmt":"2010-06-29T02:26:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www-rohan.sdsu.edu\/~arendt\/wp\/?page_id=32"},"modified":"2016-10-17T21:03:54","modified_gmt":"2016-10-17T21:03:54","slug":"why-study-hannah-arendt-why-now","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/seminar-description\/why-study-hannah-arendt-why-now\/","title":{"rendered":"Why study Hannah Arendt? Why now?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Called the \u201cmost original and profound\u2026political theoretician of our times\u201d for her work on totalitarianism, perhaps more than any other modern thinker, Hannah Arendt helps us understand the politics of terror and confront the awful reality that not only \u201cmonsters\u201d but also ordinary people commit atrocities against one another. As Hans-Ulrich Thamer, the curator of a new exhibition at the German Historical Museum in Berlin, \u201cHitler and the Germans: Nation and Crime,\u201d noted, \u201cAs a person, Hitler was a very ordinary man. He was nothing without the people.\u201d (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/10\/16\/world\/europe\/16hitler.html?_r=1&amp;ref=world\"><em>New York Times<\/em>, October 16, 2010, p. 1<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>In the post-9\/11 world, Arendt\u2019s wisdom seems more germane than ever. Reading Arendt now against the backdrop of the \u201cwar on terror\u201d and in the context of what is called \u201cglobalization\u201d means confronting profound political and moral issues that emerge in different ways in history, social studies, and literature classrooms. Is sovereignty the highest good of the state? Do nations have obligations to one another? Are there universal human rights? Are these rights enforceable? Is evil a problem of human nature or culture? What explains the rise of totalitarian power and the use of terror and fear as instruments of politics?\u00a0 As the language of good and evil circulates in politics and the media, filters into all our classrooms and affects the social dynamics of \u201cinsider\/outsider\u201d operating informally on many school campuses today, Arendt invites us to think about the human condition? Her writing urges us to think about the roots of \u201cthe problem of evil,\u201d about the meaning of human plurality and diversity, and about the use of terror and violence by both state and non-state actors to resolve conflict or redress grievances. My hope is that studying Arendt together with a diverse group of colleagues will encourage us to encourage our students and peers to think before we act.<\/p>\n<p>Each of the two central texts chosen for this seminar represents distinct, yet interwoven, aspects of Arendt\u2019s reflections on what she called the \u201chuman condition of plurality.\u201d Each explores the philosophical implications of different crises generated by social conflict in the twentieth century. Together they continue to have remarkable cogency and relevance. They repay the patient reader of these difficult works with the rewards of being challenged to reconsider the complex historical roots of totalitarianism and the persistence of tensions between freedom and equality even in democratic societies.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the most disconcerting of Arendt&#8217;s writing\u00a0 we will examine is <em>Eichmann in Jerusalem<\/em>. <em>Eichmann<\/em> is a haunting book. Originally commissioned as a series of articles written for <em>The New Yorker<\/em>, it became Arendt\u2019s meditation on morality. Written as what she called a \u201creport\u201d on the Israeli trial of Nazi deportation coordinator Adolf Eichmann, Arendt reached disturbing conclusions in it about who bore responsibility for the Final Solution.<\/p>\n<p>Sitting in that Jerusalem courtroom, Arendt said, she was struck by an odd and disturbing thought&#8211;that the evil reflected in Eichmann\u2019s crimes, the atrocities against humanity he had committed, was the product neither of a madman nor a wicked man nor a monster, but rather of an ordinary, normal human who had acted<em> without thought<\/em>. To Arendt, Eichmann was terrifying because he was \u201cthoughtless.\u201d The real trouble, she said, was so many were like him, normal people who did awful things to one another.<\/p>\n<p>The controversy surrounding the publication of <em>Eichmann <\/em>raged for many years and the wisdom of Arendt\u2019s tone and conclusions continue to be debated. The timely release of <em>Hannah Arendt: The Movie<\/em>, combined with the fiftieth anniversary in 2013 of the publication of <em>Eichmann<\/em> has stimulated interest in the book all over again. Most recently, Bettina Stangneth\u2019s <em>Eichmann Before Jerusalem<\/em> countered Arendt\u2019s portrait of Eichmann with extensive new scholarship on Eichmann\u2019s career. Yet, the importance of what she wrote about the problem of evil warrants consideration, especially in light of the ease with which different groups target others for vilification today.<\/p>\n<p>In a dense book published more than fifty years ago, <em>The Origins of Totalitarianism (OT), <\/em>Arendt sought to \u201cdiscover the hidden mechanics by which all the traditional elements of our political and spiritual world [had been] dissolved.\u201d After the book\u2019s publication she explained she hadn\u2019t intended to provide a linear history but wanted to identify the peculiar \u201cfixed and definite forms\u201d into which various aspects of western political theories and practices had crystallized in the \u201cevent\u201d of totalitarianism. To Arendt, totalitarianism represented the \u201ccrystallization\u201d of elements of racism and conquest present in European thought as early as the eighteenth century, but which the disintegration of the nation-state system following the First World War had exacerbated.<\/p>\n<p>To bring into relief patterns of interaction among those elements, Arendt painted an enormous canvas of the political and social history of modern Europe in broad, bold strokes. She argued that racism and imperialism combined to erode the principles of a common humanity through the creation of \u201claws of exception\u201d or separate sets of rights for stateless peoples, codified in the post-WW I peace treaties known as the Minority Treaties. And she identified the emergence of mass movements as forms of \u201cnegative solidarity\u201d developing out of what she termed the \u201cbreakdown of the class system,\u201d highlighting how such movements rested on majority consensus.<\/p>\n<p>What is especially instructive for the contemporary reader of <em>OT<\/em> is the fact that Arendt located the origins of terror and ideology within Western, democratic societies. She urged reading the record of what she then called the \u201ctruly radical nature of Evil\u201d in totalitarianism as a cautionary tale about the \u201csubterranean stream of <em>Western<\/em> history\u201d (emphasis added). Arendt\u2019s story of the hidden underbelly of western history provides a controversial counterpoint for the seminar to engage in critical thinking about the apparently prevalent contemporary identification of terrorism with non-western societies today. At the same time, Arendt&#8217;s identification of the Holocaust as a unique and unprecedented event remains a particularly thorny dimension of her work.<\/p>\n<p>To round out our consideration of Arendt as a &#8220;public intellectual in the public square,&#8221; we will also explore selected additional essays of hers, including \u201cPersonal Responsibility under Dictatorship,\u201d \u201cThe Crisis in Education,\u201d \u201cReflections on Little Rock,\u201d and some pieces she wrote in the 1940s before the state of Israel was created.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Called the \u201cmost original and profound\u2026political theoretician of our times\u201d for her work on totalitarianism, perhaps more than any other modern thinker, Hannah Arendt helps us understand the politics of terror and confront the awful reality that not only \u201cmonsters\u201d but also ordinary people commit atrocities against one another. As Hans-Ulrich Thamer, the curator of a new exhibition at the German Historical Museum in Berlin, \u201cHitler and the Germans: Nation and Crime,\u201d noted, \u201cAs a person, Hitler was a very ordinary man. He was nothing without the people.\u201d (New York Times, October 16, 2010, p. 1) In the post-9\/11 world, Arendt\u2019s wisdom seems more germane than ever. Reading Arendt now against the backdrop of the \u201cwar on terror\u201d and in the context of what is called \u201cglobalization\u201d means confronting profound political and moral issues that emerge in different ways in history, social studies, and literature classrooms. Is sovereignty the highest good of the state? Do nations have obligations to one another? Are there universal human rights? Are these rights enforceable? Is evil a problem of human nature or culture? What explains the rise of totalitarian power and the use of terror and fear as instruments of politics?\u00a0 As the language&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":10,"menu_order":6,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-32","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1223,"href":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32\/revisions\/1223"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arendt.sdsu.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}